Margaret Atwood's Dystopian novel The Handmaid's Tale, written over a 2 year period from 1984-5, is based upon the 'unlikely' premise that a far-right religious extremist group overthrows the US government, suspends the constitution and forms an authoritarian regime, the Republic of Gilead, in which women are not allowed to work, read, or write and are only valued by their fertility.
At the time she was writing it, the scenario seemed utterly far-fetched. As Atwood commented recently: ''Back in 1984 the main premise seemed ~ even to me fairly outrageous. Would I be able to persuade readers that the United States had suffered a coup that had transformed an erstwhile liberal democracy into a literal-minded theocratic dictatorship?'' (New York Times Book Review)
Unlikely as her concept seemed then, the history of Gilead and the 'herstory' of Offred resonates strongly today. I believe, personally, that we are sleepwalking towards Gilead, although we are as yet unaware that we have embarked upon the journey. My view is founded upon the way that certain rights are under threat in this country (UK) in a way they have never been before. This is how the journey is unfolding.
* Control of Language
Without our conscious awareness, we are subtly being fed new meanings to words that alter our perception of the people to whom they apply. Take the word immigrant for instance: do you not find yourself adding 'illegal' to it? How about Benefit ~ applicant or scrounger? This demonization of certain groups in society has been validated by the government and numerous TV reality programmes, where selective cutting creates a picture of people outside mainstream society.
* Control of the Streets
In the wake of the London/Manchester attacks, how many times have we walked past men in body armour carrying guns? When did this become normal? At what point do we tacitly accept that our 'freedom' is dependant upon men with guns patrolling our streets? Men who are trained to shoot and kill.
*Control of Rights
Theresa May has made it quite clear that she is prepared to 'rip up human rights laws to fight terror'. It sounds 'strong and stable', but behind the rhetoric is a frightening prospect. Consider what human rights consist of:
Right to life
Freedom from torture
Freedom from slavery
Freedom of speech
Freedom of thought, conscience and religion
Freedom of movement
Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.”
Which right are you happy to be ripped up? And if one, why not two, three, or more? It is a slippery slope. Currently, we stand at the top of it looking down.
*Control of Conscience
We live in a pluralistic multi-culture, where 'citizens of the world' rub shoulders. Many diverse faiths, beliefs exist side by side. I would never question your deity (or none), but when religion and politics shake hands, it makes me uneasy. Theresa May's power-hunger decision to hold on to her job at all cost, has led her to seek support from the DUP, a strict Protestant group that holds strong views on women's rights and marriage. Is this another step on the road to Gilead? In agreeing to prop up her party in the House of Commons, what will they want in return?
*Control of Nationality
We are beginning to glimpse the forces behind Brexit: the vast sums poured into campaigns, the outright and manipulative lies peddled, the use of analytics and 'bots' to influence the outcome. The dismissal of any 'experts' speaking against the project, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that they are correct, are dismissed. We 'want our sovereignty back', we 'want to be in control of our borders'. We are continually told that we will have greater freedom post Brexit. In Gilead, Aunt Lydia spoke of 'freedom to and freedom from. In the days of anarchy it was freedom to. Now you are being given freedom from.' My question is: how can you be 'given' freedom? (see section on human rights)
*Control of Nationality
We are beginning to glimpse the forces behind Brexit: the vast sums poured into campaigns, the outright and manipulative lies peddled, the use of analytics and 'bots' to influence the outcome. The dismissal of any 'experts' speaking against the project, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that they are correct, are dismissed. We 'want our sovereignty back', we 'want to be in control of our borders'. We are continually told that we will have greater freedom post Brexit. In Gilead, Aunt Lydia spoke of 'freedom to and freedom from. In the days of anarchy it was freedom to. Now you are being given freedom from.' My question is: how can you be 'given' freedom? (see section on human rights)
The cry 'it couldn't possibly happen here' echoes hollowly down the ages. It was said by my German Jewish grandparents as the Nuremberg Race Laws were drawn up. The belief that people would come to their senses, and reject what those in government were proposing to do, stopped them from leaving Berlin, and ended with their deportation and deaths in Auschwitz concentration camp.
As Offred, the heroine of Atwood's novel says: ''We didn't look up from our phones until it was too late.'' We need collectively to wake up, look up, and understand the current direction of travel, before we forget where we started out from.
Sources:
'We have to speak up now' (Jane Mulkerrins. Guardian 10th June 2017)
The Handmaid's Tale (Margaret Atwood. publ. Vintage 1966)
No is not enough: Defeating the New Shock Politics (Naomi Klein. publ. Allen Lane June 2017)
Ooof, Carol. This is sobering stuff, but I found myself nodding at every paragraph. A slippery slope indeed. This is the stuff of discourse analysis...I remember it well from living in South Africa, where one man's freedom fighter was another man's terrorist...and you are right! The word immigrant has indeed become paired with 'illegal'. It's an insidious process.
ReplyDeleteStrong stuff and sadly I agree with you. People I considered level-headed have become almost hysterical
ReplyDeleteReblogged on my blog. Worth reading, Carol! Thank you
ReplyDeleteInsidious is indeed the word ask most people and they would say Oh hysterical because their eyes are closed their brains washed ! Well said my lovely friend x
ReplyDeleteI see where you're coming from - and if there is no organised opposition we could so easily slide into a terrible future. But ... there are voices speaking out, on blogs like yours, in the courts (Gina Miller), on social media. Yes, there is too much toxic-speak that peddles fear and hatred. But there are plenty of us who can see what's happening and will stand up and shout from the rooftops to try to stop it. We can - and we will - write and speak and refuse to lie down and conform.
ReplyDeleteThis was a very good and timely post. I agree with Jo. There are a lot of people who see what's coming and who aren't willing to stand by and do nothing about it.
ReplyDeleteYup, yup, yup. But I do feel a glimmer of hope after the last election. TM's position is unsustainable and JC is less of a joke.
ReplyDeleteWOW! *Nods head in absolute agreement* Though I do feel that for the first time in a long time, there is hope; in the form of Jeremy Corbyn. Powerful read, Carol. Well done x
ReplyDeleteWell written, thank you so much, Carol. I particularly take note of how language is changed to manipulate our thoughts. When someone in authority lies and gets challenged about it, they say they 'misspoke'. Oh, and Tresemme is a power-hungry evil cow.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this, Carol. The human rights plan is even scarier than Brexit. I'd urge everyone to familiarize themselves with Human Rights.A very clear eight-page document. I quote also: Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need."
ReplyDeletehttp://rense.com/general37/char.htm